At the end of 3 years, all owners will be obliged to subscribe. Then they told all us owners that we had now 'bought' a 3 year 'licence' to use the app. And, as is the case in almost every aspect of life, owning an asset is far better than renting it.įor example, TomTom sold TomTom navigation for Android as a stand alone.
It is a way to turn owners of Lightroom into renters of Lightroom. People - be absolutely clear that the subscription 'option' is nothing to do with enhancing the capabilities of this application. They may be able to shell out ad nauseam for the app - which they once had the option to own outright and upgrade if and when they felt so inclined. The idea that every little tweak that Adobe pasts into L/R and the bundled apps may keep these people happy.
I don't want to be stuck with a subscription rate which Adobe can jack up at will, once I'm nailed to the CC floor. I don't want the pathetic - outrageous! - storage allocations that come with the subscription options.
0 kommentar(er)
